Facebook Engineers violate Conservative's Freedom of Speech. AGAIN !!!!!!

                  Facebook insider reveals corruption and violation of Conservative's Free Speech and Expression while it conducts censorship. Labelling them as Trolls. The Facebook insider who screened content of user accounts daily began to notice a growing trend of negative actions being taken against Conservative User accounts. And the whistleblower who has been  fired since the revelations from Facebook took her story to Project Veritas.
                    12/ 15/ 2017 ActiondeboostLiveDistribution was authored and created by Danny Ben David. This code that was created was intended to maliciously alter the Conservative Facebook User's account after a post that was said not to be aligned with the general consensus of Facebook ideology concerning current political divisions in the United States.
                    Some actions that were taken against the Conservative User's were " Blocking " and not allowing potential shares of Conservative posts , pictures and videos. " Interrupting bandwidth for uploads". " Deboosted Conservative Live Streams ". " Backtraced " by Facebook engineers via IP address and identities were shared with liberal activists. They also targeted Conservatives as trolls and at times deleted their accounts. And shared them with liberal activists.
                   Two well known Conservative virtual voices , Steven Crowder and Daily Caller were among many targeted Conservatives. Mr. Crowder happened to settle out of court with Facebook after filing a lawsuit. This type authoritarian rule was also conducted by Twitter last year. Conservative user accounts were being heavily censored and shut down for not complying to the left political ideology. Like Twitter , Facebook also used keywords with their code to censor Conservative accounts. Keywords like God , Guns , America. Also pictures of the United States Flag and the Christian Cross. All targeted as hate speech and toxic for their giant social media reach to the internet.
                  Another company that was allowed to harvest Conservative user data for nefarious intentions was Cambridge Analytica. Who was guilty of data mining Conservative Facebook accounts back in April of 2018. They also had to testify in front of Congress for their actions. The Washington DC Attorney General sued Cambridge Analytica on behalf of tens of millions of users of whom account were compromised. Which also could be the likely scenario for Facebook again.
                   

Supreme Court has unaminous decision 2019

          The United States Supreme Court deicided unanimously against Heavy Fines and Civil Fortfeiture. On February 20, 2019 Justice Ginsburg released the courts decision. In favor of a Indiana defendant who was guilty of transporting $225.00 of Heroin in his Land Rover. The $42,000 pricey vehicle was then siezed by law enforcement. This case was found to be in violation of the Eighth Amendment , which bans excessive fines. The defendants $225.00 amount of Heroin and then has essentially $42,000.00 siezed. This disproportionate action itself is the violation. Justice Thomas did comment on such a decision will clearly open the door to appeals and litigation for past and future cases. 

          There has been many cases across the United States where excessive fines and gross civil forfeiture has gone uncontested. And many law enforcement agencies have operated as they wish. This decision will now hopefully show cause for a more reasonable approach and respect for our Constitutional Rights as Citizens.

Arizona looks to effectively rid of Patriot Guard and dishonor our fallen.

             HB2694 In Arizona legislator is a bill that would effectively not allow the continuation of the Patriot Guard Riders and their honorary funeral escorts for our fallen veterans and first responders. As many may know or have seen the parade of motorcycles with flags rumbling down streets escorting a fallen veteran is a sight to be seen. As a effort to give one last honorary tribute to their service the Patriot Guard Riders have grown to be a part of many veteran funerals.
             Representative, Campbell and the following are listed as sponsors or co-sponsors  is this bill for the Transportation Committee.  Andrade, Blackman, Blanc, Bolding, Butler, Chávez, Cook, Espinoza, Fernandez, Friese, Lawrence, Lieberman, Longdon, Meza, Pawlik, Powers Hannley, Rodriguez, Sierra, Stringer, Teller, Terán, Toma, Tsosie, Senator Mendez We urge the reader to become informed and read the bill in its entirety. https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/54leg/1R/bills/HB2694P.pdf
             We find this particularly interesting when you read section 32-1309 Fees. And seems to be a ulterior motives. It is quite expensive to be a Funeral Escort and not very appropriate to require a Non-Profit like Patriot Guard Riders to pay the fee's associated. We will be monitoring this as it progresses.
              If you want to reach out to your Representative to express your concern regarding this bill you can do so via the following:
Noel W. Campbell, Chairman , ncampnell@azleg.gov , (602) 926-3124
Leo Biasiucci, Vice-Chairman , LBIASIUCCI@azleg.gov , (602) 926-3018
Richard C. Andrade , RANDRADE@azleg.gov , (602) 926-3130 
Rosanna Gabaldón , RGABALDON@azleg.gov , (602) 926-3424
Kevin Payne , KPAYNE@azleg.gov , (602) 926-4854
Arlando Teller , ATELLER@azleg.gov , (602) 926-3069
Bob Thorpe , BTHORPE@azleg.gov , (602) 926-5219
           
         

Manafort is " Toast "

https://www.axios.com/mueller-investigation-paul-manafort-sentence-7e78d54d-ed73-43a2-a671-d697f78b5d39.html

        Provided by Axios the Manafort documents were quickly provided. But I urge my readers to review the Government's Sentencing Memorandum regarding Mr. Paul Manafort Jr. The Government's position in short recommends to District Court that Manafort to serve a sentence of 235 to 293 months in prison. With the number of Bank Fraud and Tax Fraud and numerous other financial crimes amounting to several millions of dollars over a period of a decade or more , the government contends that he willfully and knowingly committed the crimes over the long time frame.
        Paul Manafort Jr. who is currently 69 could essentially be serving a life sentence for a non - capital offense. Which will likely be a factor within the court's decision. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has set the Manafort case for March 5th.

Supreme Court allows temporary injunction for Louisiana Abortion Law 2019

            Recently the State of Louisiana had signed a new Abortion Law  in response to the numerous other states recently passing their own abortion laws that have made it to the spotlight for being radically in favor of abortion up to the birth of the child. ( New York State Abortion Law http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/lawssrch.cgi?NVLWO: . Louisianas' new law essentially mimiced the Texas Abortion Law which was overruled as in violation of the " Whole Woman's Health " case.
             But Louisiana was signing into Law  ( 14:87, et seq. 40:1299.31 to 40.1299.35.18 ) that required Doctors to seek admitting privileges to local hospitals within 30 miles of their clinics. And had 45 days to seek these privileges to remain practicing. Opponents saw this as a major obstacle and direct violation of the law decided in " Whole Woman's Health vs. Hellerstedt ". And the State of Louisiana acknowledges that " If within the new law that the Doctors cannot obtain Admitting privileges the law would maybe violate Whole Woman's Health vs. Hellerstedt ". And the doctors would need to cease being Abortion providers.
              After review and decision by the District Court the case has been pursued on to the Supreme Court of the United States. After being reviewed a " Stay " has been granted temporarily , stopping the Law from being implemented. Upon the timely submission of Petition for Writ of Certiorari the case will be then be heard and decided upon.
             

HB2270 Arizona Sentencing reform bill

           Arizona is attempting to reform its sentencing guidelines to curb the amount of those incarcerated and attempt to return those who are safe , back to society to reform their own lives. With many opposing the reform it is facing a uphill battle. For those not familiar with Arizona sentencing , it has been long tradition of
" lock em up and throw away the key ". Arizona prison system has roughly 42,000 inmates and is currently at 95% capacity ( 2018 ). Of these recent stats 70% of these new arrivals are non - violent offenders. Arizona DOC inmates serve 25 - 100% more time incarcerated than the national average. Arizona is fourth in the nation for the most incarcerated. The modern day view now is changing Arizona corrections from a retribution penal state to a more rehabilitation state. It is almost a one out of four people have either been to jail or prison in Arizona. And the tide and ramifications because of this looks to be soon reversed. We saw some reform start at the local levels when courts adopted " Veteran Courts " to help alternative avenues for veterans that found themselves on the wrong side of the law. Local rehabilitation services for addicts were not only implemented on the local level but also state level as well. The hard line approach of Sheriff " Joe's       ( Maricopa County Sheriff ) pink underwear " is fading fast.
          HB2270 has been written with the following sentencing changes but we should remember the bill is still in the building stages and has been read twice in the Arizona House or Representatives. The bill was assigned 1/24/2019.

         Non - violent offenses reduction to 50%
         Dangerous Offenders reduction to 75%
         DCAC ( Dangerous Crimes Against Children ) reduction to 85%
       
       Taking on Arizona sentencing guidelines is no small task. As many know computation of sentences within Arizona Criminal code is the most backwards , upside down , forward , sideways complex system there can be. So considering why it took so long to reform is easily understood. This doesn't make it right but does explain the chaos. And of course many inmates and family's separated from those inmates receive the brunt of the results.
       Now HB2270 reduces the time of incarceration. And in turn increases the time that the inmate serves on " Community Supervision ". Which means depending on the offense and severity will determine the amount of monitoring that will be required by AZDOC to continue the sentence but on Community Supervision.
       HB2270 also has some revisions to go through. There are some questions arising about the computation and whether this applies to " Flat - time " sentences. If so how? There are many experts working on this at this time and hopefully will have the bill not only apply to new criminal cases but also retroactively.

https://corrections.az.gov/sites/default/files/REPORTS/CAG/2018/cagdec18.pdf
https://corrections.az.gov/sites/default/files/documents/PDFs/adc-appropriationsreport_fy2019_0.pdf
https://36shgf3jsufe2xojr925ehv6-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/The-High-Price-of-Prison-Growth.pdf
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2018/03/more-imprisonment-does-not-reduce-state-drug-problems